Should we set the year 2000 as the date for the Lord's return?
No, the year 2000 should not be set as the date for the Lord's return. The Jubilee calculations are interesting, but they do not establish the date of His return. That refers to the second coming, not the rapture, and if the rapture precedes it by seven years, time is short.
Les explains that Brother Jeffreys calculated that the fall of the year 2000 would be the 120th Jubilee since Adam, the 70th Jubilee since Joshua led Israel into Canaan, and the 40th Jubilee from the crucifixion. These figures show how completely God's time frames fit together. But Les warns that we must be careful not to tie ourselves to that and say this is when the Lord is going to return. That refers to His second coming, not the rapture. If the rapture takes place seven years ahead of the second coming, as Les believes and as Brother Jeffreys does, then we are getting awfully close.