Yes — Les Feldick teaches that the 'sons of God' were the godly line of Seth and the 'daughters of men' were the ungodly line of Cain, whose intermarriage produced the offspring described as giants in Genesis 6:4.
In the evidence provided, Les explicitly rejects the angelic interpretation and aligns with the view that the 'sons of God' are the line of Seth. He explains that this godly line had kept itself separate from the line of Cain, but eventually intermarried. The giants of Genesis 6:4 are the offspring of that union, according to the biblical text.
Genesis 6:4 — This is the verse that directly mentions the giants and connects them to the union of the 'sons of God' and 'daughters of men'.
Genesis 6:4 (KJV) states: 'There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.' This verse explicitly ties the presence of giants to the offspring of the 'sons of God' and 'daughters of men.' The Bible does not, in this passage, explain the physical reason for their being called giants; it simply states that they existed and were also described as 'mighty men' of old.
Les Feldick acknowledges the controversy over the identity of the 'sons of God.' Some believe they were angelic beings who cohabited with human women, producing giants. But Les says he 'will stay with' the view that the 'sons of God' were the godly line of Seth, who had kept themselves separated from the ungodly line of Cain. He explains that their children had intermarried within this family, maintaining separation until, over the years, they began to intermarry with the line of Cain. Les compares this to the church age, where the Christian community once stayed separate from the world but eventually overlapped and joined with it. His teaching establishes that the intermarriage between these two lines is the context for the giants of Genesis 6:4.
Les clearly states that he stays with the interpretation that the 'sons of God' are the godly line of Seth, not angels. He notes that many good men hold the angelic view, but he aligns with those who see the text as referring to the descendants of Seth. He describes how this line had kept itself 'pretty much' from the ungodly line of Cain, with children intermarrying within the family.
In the provided excerpt, Les does not elaborate on the physical stature of the giants, but he sets forth the identity of the two groups whose union Genesis 6:4 associates with the giants. By identifying the 'sons of God' as the line of Seth and the 'daughters of men' as the line of Cain, he places the giants as the offspring of that long-separated lines finally intermarrying. The scriptural text itself directly links the giants to this union.
Les's View on the Sons of God
Les Feldick teaches that the 'sons of God' are the godly line of Seth, not angels, and that their eventual intermarriage with the line of Cain sets the stage for the giants mentioned in Genesis 6:4.
Revelation 20 Explained: Satan Bound, the Millennium & Final Judgment
They come up and become then the flesh and blood people of the Kingdom Age, and they will have children. They will have all kinds of children for a thousand years. You want to remember there is no death to speak of, and there's no sickness, no disease, it's going to be much like it was in the Garden of Eden, and so it's going to be a tremendous population explosion for this thousand years.
What the Bible Really Says About the Old Sin Nature
Back in Genesis chapter 1, verse 26, a verse you all know very well, and God said, "...let us," that's a plurality word, it's a plural pronoun, as it should be, "...Elohim said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness, and let them," that is created being man, "...have dominion over the fish, the sea, the cattle, the earth, and so on and so forth." Now verse 27, "...
Who Did Cain Marry? & The Mystery of Enoch (Genesis 4-5 Bible Study)
Well, in the few moments that we have left, let's go on into chapter 5, verse 1. Now, this is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him. Male and female he created them, blessed them, and called their name Adam. And remember we referred to that in one of our earlier lessons.
What Happens When the Lamb Opens the Seals — Revelation 6
But nevertheless, as a personage, He is certainly referred to as the Son, back here in the Old Testament. "...So I saw in the night visions, and behold, one like the Son of Man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of Days," which is no doubt a reference to the Father now, the other person of the Godhead. And "...they brought Him," that is the Son, "...near before Him.
Noah’s Ark & Your Salvation: A Deep Bible Study on Eternal Security
For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they might be, they can hope to be, no but what? They are. See, that's a present tense verb. They are what? The sons of God, or children of God. Now, let's just take a contemporary situation. Let's say a family, husband and wife, have born two or three children. But one of those children becomes a belligerent renegade.
What the Bible Really Says About Homosexuality — Romans 1
It's what it was then, it's been ever since, and it still is. Genesis 19, verse 1. "...and there came two angels to Sodom at evening." Now remember these two angels back in chapter 18 were called what? Come back to chapter 18, verse 2. Genesis 18, verse 2. "...and he lifted up his eyes, and looked, and lo! three men.
Why Did God Hate Esau? Romans 9:13 and Sovereignty Explained
And then verse three. And I hated Esau, and I laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness. Now again, you have to go back into ancient history. And the offspring of Esau, of course, were the Edomites. And the Edomites were mountain dwellers.
Genesis 6:1-2: And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
These verses introduce the 'sons of God' and 'daughters of men' whose unions are directly tied to the giants in verse 4.
Genesis 6:4: There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
This is the key verse that names the offspring as 'giants' and links them to the intermarriage of the two groups.
Les takes the view that the 'sons of God' are the godly line of Seth, not angels. He explains that this line had kept themselves separated from the ungodly line of Cain, but eventually intermarried with them.
No. In the evidence, Les mentions that some good men hold that angelic view, but he says he stays with the interpretation that the 'sons of God' were the line of Seth. He does not teach angelic-human hybrids.
Genesis 6:4 says, 'There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.' It connects the giants directly to these unions.
Watch the Teaching: The Days of Noah: Understanding the "Sons of God" & Coming Judgment