When Paul and the Jerusalem apostles compared notes in conference, did they compare doctrine or experience?
In conference, Paul and the Jerusalem apostles compared doctrine, not experience. The text states they began comparing notes of doctrine rather than experience, and when they compared doctrine, the outcome followed. This comparison concerned the truth of the gospel, which Paul would not surrender, so it continued with the Gentiles.
Les explains from the context that the Jerusalem leaders—Peter, James, John, and the rest—seemed to be somewhat, but their authority had slipped because Israel had rejected it all and was slipping away. Paul was under pressure, yet he says they did not give in by subjection, no, not for an hour, so that the truth of the gospel might continue with the Gentiles. When they really started comparing notes in conference, they compared doctrine, not experience.
But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth no man’s person:) for they who seemed to be somewhat in conference added nothing to me:
More Questions
What happened when the Jerusalem leaders compared notes in conference?
When the Jerusalem leaders met in conference and compared notes of doctrine rather than experience, that comparison is what revealed the difference.
What happened when Paul met with the 12 in conference?
In the conference between Paul and the leaders, the 12 added nothing to Paul's doctrine.
Why did the Jerusalem apostles add nothing to Paul's message?
The Jerusalem leaders added nothing to Paul because they had no comprehension of the revelations Paul had received from the Ascended Lord.